Because if you work with the government all you need to work is three hours. Here's how to spend the other 37 hours.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
And now for something completely different...
Slate has a really interesting article on finding common ground in the abortion debate in the country. It's a thoughtful piece that lays out some ways that "pro-life" ) groups could really impact the number of abortions in the US (The # 3 way is to "embrace contraception"). A lot of these are "no duh" concepts, but it's really nice to hear these ideas come out of the "pro-life" movement. Actually, the " " maybe unnecessary in this case. These groups (at least some of them) may actually earn the pro-life moniker, since they are pursuing ways of reducing abortion without taking away choice.
Here's a snippet from the article:
"If this were to happen—if pro-lifers were to embrace contraception and give it moral sanction—it wouldprevent more abortions than any anti-abortion lawwould. Another conference participant, Jen Roth ofAll Our Lives, alluded to surveys indicating that most people who call themselves pro-life, defined broadly,support contraception."
No comments:
Post a Comment